Would present or past?Asked by: Irwin Legros
Score: 4.7/5 (25 votes)
Technically, would is the past tense of will, but it is an auxiliary verb that has many uses, some of which even express the present tense.View full answer
Also asked, Is would be past or future?
Would is a past-tense form of will. If you are writing about past events, you can use it to indicate something that was in the future at that point in time, but is not necessarily in the future right now. In other words, you use would to preserve the future aspect when talking about the past.
In this regard, What is the past tense of would?. Would has no tenses, no participles, and no infinitive form. There is no past tense, but would have followed by a past participle can be used for talking about actions that did not happen: She would have bought the house if she had been able to afford it (=she did not buy it).
In respect to this, Is would present or future?
We use would as the past of will, to describe past beliefs about the future: I thought we would be late, so we would have to take the train.
Is could present tense?
Could is used for past and future instances, or sometimes in the present tense (although in the present tense it is normally describing a possibility or is part of a question).
Many English learners get will and would confused because they're used in very similar situations. But they're not the same. The main difference between will and would is that will is used for real possibilities while would is used for imagined situations in the future.
You have to use "had had" if something has been done long back, not recently. But if something has been done recently, then you can use "have had" or "has had" depending on the pronoun. For example, I have had a good lunch this afternoon.
The present perfect continuous is formed with have/has been and the -ing form of the verb. We normally use the present perfect continuous to emphasise that something is still continuing in the present: She has been living in Liverpool all her life.
The perfect tenses are made with the helping verb have (have / has / had) plus the verbs past participle. All subjects use had for the past perfect tense. All subjects use will have or shall have for the future perfect tense. The infinitive have or has for singular third person is used for the perfect present tense.
Can, like could and would, is used to ask a polite question, but can is only used to ask permission to do or say something ("Can I borrow your car?" "Can I get you something to drink?"). Could is the past tense of can, but it also has uses apart from that--and that is where the confusion lies.
Most of the times, the source of the confusion is the perception that “would” is always used as the past form of the auxiliary verb “will”. Yes, “would” is the past form of “will”, but it has various other uses too, which have nothing to do with the fact that would is the past form of “will”.
Using would as as a kind of past tense of will or going to is common in reported speech: She said that she would buy some eggs. ("I will buy some eggs.") The candidate said that he wouldn't increase taxes.
Could is used as the past tense of can when it means that someone had the ability to do something, or that something was possible: The Roman army could march 30 miles in a day.
She can speak several languages. He can swim like a fish. ... She could speak several languages. They couldn't dance very well.
would for past habits is slightly more formal than used to. It is often used in stories. We don't normally use the negative or question form of would for past habits. Note that we can't usually use would to talk about past states.
The present perfect is formed using the present tense of the verb "to have" and the past participle of the main verb. The past perfect tense says that an action was completed at a time before another action happened in the past. ... Present perfect: The kids have eaten dinner.
Definition of the present perfect tense. The present perfect is used to indicate a link between the present and the past. The time of the action is before now but not specified, and we are often more interested in the result than in the action itself.
3 Answers. Present Perfect is called like that because it combines the present grammatical tense (you have) and the perfect grammatical aspect (done). Compare that to Past Perfect which uses the past tense (you had + done), or the Future Perfect which uses the future "tense" (you will have + done).
1. 'Has' is the third person singular present tense of 'have' while 'had' is the third person singular past tense and past participle of 'have. ... Both are transitive verbs, but 'has' is used in sentences that talk about the present while 'had' is used in sentences that talk about the past.
In the present perfect, the auxiliary verb is always have (for I, you, we, they) or has (for he, she, it). In the past perfect, the auxiliary verb is always had. We use have had in the present perfect when the main verb is also “have”: I'm not feeling well.
Had had is the past perfect form of have when it is used as a main verb to describe our experiences and actions. We use the past perfect when we are talking about the past and want to refer back to an earlier past time, Madiini.
We have this in the past tense, simple past tense and then, in that past tense thought, we have some idea about the future and we use Would to express that idea about the future. Let's look at some examples of this though. Here, I knew you would help me. ... So we can use Would to talk about future but in the past.
Would is the past tense form of will.
It will implies that it is going to be done by John; “it would be done by John” does not make sense on its own unless you were saying something like: “It would have been done by John but...” as in John was going to but didn't.
Could is used to say that an action or event is possible. Would is used to talk about a possible or imagined situation, and is often used when that possible situation is not going to happen.